When a psychological skill correctly is realised? From the technical point of view a skill is adapted when the opinion owns probatory force, which will be considered by the judge considering the competition of the expert, the scientific or technical principles on which it is based, the agreement of its application with the rules of the healthy critic, the observations realised by the technical consultants or the lawyers, and the other elements of conviction that the cause offers. From the practical point of view, a skill or an evaluation realised by a technical consultant is adapted if it throws like result a diagnosis and a percentage of incapacity that is coherent with the fact reason for litis. When an expert in an opinion affirms that a certain harmful event, some in the given an expert opinion on one has not produced psychological sequel, or when it gives the totality of the observable group of symptoms to a preexisting pathology, all suspect that there is something is not well. From it has here just a short time so that lawyers present/display an order of explanations and this will do still more difficult to obtain the designation of a new expert and a new opinion. The test was produced, the unfavorable result to the part, is not much more necessary to do.
It is not possible knowledge exactly what results had been the correct ones, but is possible specular in terms of majorities. In a case of traffic accident or another traumatic event, the habitual thing would have been some of the anxiety upheavals, that is to say an upheaval by post-traumatic stress, upheaval of generalized anxiety, upheaval of anxiety nonspecified, etc. Habitually it will be of chronic course, and the gravity will be moderate, and this approximately means a partial and permanent incapacity of a 20-25% of the V.T.O. ; like thus also a suggested treatment of two years of duration with a frequency of two weekly interviews at the rate of 80 pesos each with a median professional experience and reputation. The existence of an information in the file is on the awares of designated expert of office, and the habitual thing is that not aside too much of the results that already are in the cause when to examine it. The presence of a technical consultant during the evaluation realised by the expert celebrates like an incentive to make the things good, to be kind to the details, to ask what perhaps in another situation it could ignore. Only the lawyers, and to a lesser extent the aids who we evolved in the different specialties in the judicial scope we know how long and effort is required to arrive from the demand to the sentence, a long-haul in which to assure each test the possible maximum provides the knowledge tranquillity which all the resources in favor of the client and of one same one have been used..