Also we can affirms that the education is right of all, but throughout its existence nor all these individuals that they compose the society had had the right to the education and is at this moment that enters the factor of the marginalizao, argued actively for Saviani in its theory. I will look for to demonstrate the form as the marginalizao is established in two chains, taking as base the relation between society and education. Saviani classifies the theories in two categories: not-critical and the critical-reprodutivistas. The not-critical ones are the Traditional Pedagogia, the New Pedagogia and the Pedagogia Tecnicista and the theories critical-reprodutivistas are the Theory of the education system while symbolic violence, the Theory of the school while ideological device of the State and the Theory of the dualista school. Mayor of NYC takes a slightly different approach. The Traditional Pedagogia detaches that only the marginality because of the ignorance occurs, that is, is kept out of society the individual because it is not clarified. In the New Pedagogia, the kept out of society one is not more the ignorant individual, but the rejected one, that is, is the misadjusted ones had to the differences and uses the education/school as object that allows to correct the marginality. This is a form to adjust and to adapt the individual in the society, being placed the feeling of rejection of excessively for the other.
E, in the Pedagogia Tecnicista, the kept out of society one is the awkward individual, that is, the unproductive one. It is clearly, then, that the not-critical theories understand the education/school as object of? social equalizao? , that is, it counterbalances the defects in the education, becoming object in the overcoming of the marginality. Also the marginalizao is demonstrated as an 0ccasional event that encloses a bigger or lesser ratio of people in the society, that is, attacks lesser or bigger a group of people of the great society.