In the chapter the eight explana author on some practical questions, as of that the how much lesser one our intervention in the choice and the organization of what we speak, in such a way plus this internal logic will be able taking in to say them unexpected things for we ourselves, to discover something that was in our thoughts without we knew. Generally when we try to take care of our speech very that we can commit a revealing lapse. The experience of Calligaris (2008) sample that almost always finishes being led to speak on things that it did not foresee during the session. Complete when it writes ' ' of any form, the words always will take its patient for lands imprevistas' ' (p.107). On setting, when and as to ask for to the patient who lies down in div or that he continues seated its front. Calligaris (2008) says that the decision can depend simply on a comfort question, its and of its patient. I think that it is not a rule, each one works in the way that it agrees to it.
The author continues displaying that patients exist who do not aguentam the idea of speaking without seeing the face of who listening, also have those contrary patients, who do not aguentam to find the look of its therapist. concludes that setting does not go to cure nobody, and its intention is to allow that the patient if engages in the cure, that is, setting not is condition nor guarantee you are welcome. An analysis or a therapy happens for the changed words and the relations that they organize. In the preliminary interviews it is possible if to place two questions during the first meeting with the patient: if to ask if in this in case that it could be of some aid; to ask for to the patient what it waits of the therapy.