Jorge Bucay

The King and the wise, returned to the Palace. The servant had entered the circle of 99 during the next few months, the servant continued their plans as it occurred that night. One morning, the servant entered the actual hitting doors, grumbling alcove and few fleas. -Are you going? -asked the King in good way. Remote learning usually is spot on. -Me nothing happens, nothing happens. -Before, not long ago, you laugh and sang all the time. -I do my job, right? What I would like your Highness, that was its jester and his minstrel too? It wasn’t long until the King dismiss the servant. Credit: Yael Aflalo-2011.

It was not nice to have a page that was always in a bad mood. You, me and all of us have been educated in this stupid ideology: always something we need to be complete, and only complete you can enjoy what you have. Therefore, we were taught, happiness must wait to complete what is lacking. And as we always need something, the idea takes the beginning and can never enjoy life. But what if the lighting came into our lives and give us account, thus, coup that our 99 coins are one hundred per 100% of the treasure, that we not need anything, that no one stayed with ours, than one hundred not complete anything and that this is only a trap, a carrot placed in front of us so that we may be stupid, that we might live tired, malhumorados, unhappy or resigned. A trap for which we never stop pushing and that all follow the same eternally equal! Few things would change if we could enjoy our treasures such as they are. This tale is recounted by Jorge Bucay and was transcribed and adapted by the y team you can hear the audio from this story at: original author and source of the article

Royal Academy

And that step self-employed-led human beings to self-reflection thought but in turn to understand in the context of post-war collective thinking, shared reflection, perhaps socializadora-, who had to learn to say no, namely live value contrary to the past understand the suffering of the other, to understand himself through an indelible impression. Morality and economics are involved each other, but not in the Marxist sense, where the dominant ideology is that of the dominant class (Bates, g. Mercedes. Ethics). 4 a fundamental problem of human action, namely to dissociate to the executor of the action, since it is regrettable to note how certain individuals judged not only the action of the person but to the same individual. Here one might mention the naturalistic fallacy, believing that a law of nature is respectable, not considered the human being part of nature?, then, if outside a law would be respected, i.e. the law within the meaning of the domain of the human being, of their capabilities, their impulses, desires, feelings, those elements not are governed good cannot be defined, do then how you know evil? Although certain dictionaries such as the Royal Academy of the language define bad condition, disease, ethics may be bad, if it is improperly used and applied in a way that produces a social cancer, i.e. with political or economic purposes, leaving aside the relevance of the human being, their ideals, their potential, their hopes.

Maria Montessori commented that education and politics could not be hand. It would have to be questioned to what extent the political sphere the individual changed the concept of ethics and how ceased to be a symbolic animal to become an emotional, sentimental, animal that empatizaba with others, had a memory and a sorrowful reminder of the past.