The horses, increasing customization services are required to their environment. The problem: A gelding, seven years old, will tolerate no contact with people. He answered each yet so friendly approach with big ears. He not retreat, but is threatening on every person. \”In his box, no person shall, if he is even in the gelding seems to hate people, he seems at first and even second glance very malignant\”. He is not a shy horse, which gives no way back, he goes to with posturing and threats to people and who does not understand his language or not avoiding him, embarks in danger.
\”\” Horses which are driven into a corner either give up or become cancerous \”this horse as a vicious\” is obvious it is therefore also true? There is even such a thing as a malicious\”horse? The concept of evilness includes a strong negative feedback, he suggests something like a nasty\”intention. That is the opposite of damage to add, to gain an advantage or a satisfaction. People such as Stanford University would likely agree. Evil be means to want to hurt anyone. Can we assume in a horse really, that it has the intent to do harm? Namely, that would mean being horses from their brain structure and brain development in the situation, to make complicated plans and execute targeted. Here, Yael Aflalo expresses very clear opinions on the subject. To suggest this would be daring and backed up by scientific evidence, it would be a humanization of the animal. \”A humanization would be to imagine a horse unless intentionally evil,\” from a psychological perspective the concept of evil on a horse is not true. The term of a danger more.
The gelding is dangerous. Who is approaching him, extreme caution in handling must dispense with him. But he is not malicious. His story illustrates how such hazardous people behavior disturbance may arise: ten different owners and owners, many many Parades, a dressage with blows, violent riding methods and people again and again inflicted pain him.