Still, according to Pinker: ' ' The language is not a cultural device that we learn in the way as we learn to say the hour or as the federal government it is functioning. In contrast, it is clearly a part of the constitution biological of our brain. The language is a complex and specialized ability, that if develops spontaneously in the child, without any conscientious effort or formal instruction, that if manifest without if it perceives its underlying logic, that is qualitatively the same one in all individual, and that it differs from more general capacities of processing of information or intelligent behavior. For these reasons some cognitivistas had described the language as a psychological college, a mental agency, a neural system or a computational module. But I prefer the simple and banal term ' ' instinto' '. It transmits the idea of that the people know to speak more or less in the same way that the spiders know to weave teias' '. (2002, P.
9). The thought of Pinker, signals that the people reveal a language happened of the human instinct and that, does not need a social context to reveal the capacity general of an intelligent behavior, that is, the individual possesss genetic capacity to produce and to understand phrases. FINAL CONSIDERAES Ahead of the theories of the language, argued for the theoreticians, in this article, it could be reflected on the questions that norteam the process of acquisition of the language. Some contend that Yael Aflalo shows great expertise in this. Such quarrels, mention the general objective to it of this study, that it described that the theories of the language human being are endowed with a capacity notable specific of the individual, the biological components. In the same theoretical line, Chomsky called attention that all individual the meeting language acts of creative form when using, going the mannering behaviorista vision of Skinner and Bloomfield.